|
|
Cpe Name: cpe:/a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8s
Copy Results
Download Results
Select Table
| # |
CVE ID
|
CWE ID
|
# of Exploits
|
Vulnerability Type(s)
|
Publish Date
|
Update Date
|
Score
|
Gained Access Level
|
Access
|
Complexity
|
Authentication
|
Conf.
|
Integ.
|
Avail.
|
|
1 |
CVE-2013-0169 |
310 |
|
|
2013-02-08 |
2013-06-04 |
2.6 |
None |
Remote |
High |
Not required |
Partial |
None |
None |
|
The TLS protocol 1.1 and 1.2 and the DTLS protocol 1.0 and 1.2, as used in OpenSSL, OpenJDK, PolarSSL, and other products, do not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a MAC check requirement during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, aka the "Lucky Thirteen" issue. |
|
2 |
CVE-2013-0166 |
310 |
|
DoS |
2013-02-08 |
2013-06-04 |
5.0 |
None |
Remote |
Low |
Not required |
None |
None |
Partial |
|
OpenSSL before 0.9.8y, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0k, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1d does not properly perform signature verification for OCSP responses, which allows remote OCSP servers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via an invalid key. |
|
3 |
CVE-2012-2333 |
189 |
|
DoS |
2012-05-14 |
2013-06-05 |
6.8 |
None |
Remote |
Medium |
Not required |
Partial |
Partial |
Partial |
|
Integer underflow in OpenSSL before 0.9.8x, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0j, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1c, when TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2, or DTLS is used with CBC encryption, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted TLS packet that is not properly handled during a certain explicit IV calculation. |
|
4 |
CVE-2012-2110 |
119 |
|
DoS Overflow Mem. Corr. |
2012-04-19 |
2013-06-05 |
7.5 |
None |
Remote |
Low |
Not required |
Partial |
Partial |
Partial |
|
The asn1_d2i_read_bio function in crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8v, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0i, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1a does not properly interpret integer data, which allows remote attackers to conduct buffer overflow attacks, and cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact, via crafted DER data, as demonstrated by an X.509 certificate or an RSA public key. |
|
5 |
CVE-2012-1165 |
399 |
|
DoS |
2012-03-15 |
2013-05-03 |
5.0 |
None |
Remote |
Low |
Not required |
None |
None |
Partial |
|
The mime_param_cmp function in crypto/asn1/asn_mime.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8u and 1.x before 1.0.0h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted S/MIME message, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-7250. |
|
6 |
CVE-2012-0884 |
310 |
|
|
2012-03-12 |
2013-05-03 |
5.0 |
None |
Remote |
Low |
Not required |
Partial |
None |
None |
|
The implementation of Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and PKCS #7 in OpenSSL before 0.9.8u and 1.x before 1.0.0h does not properly restrict certain oracle behavior, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to decrypt data via a Million Message Attack (MMA) adaptive chosen ciphertext attack. |
|
7 |
CVE-2012-0050 |
399 |
|
DoS |
2012-01-19 |
2013-06-05 |
5.0 |
None |
Remote |
Low |
Not required |
None |
None |
Partial |
|
OpenSSL 0.9.8s and 1.0.0f does not properly support DTLS applications, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via unspecified vectors related to an out-of-bounds read. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2011-4108. |
|
8 |
CVE-2012-0027 |
399 |
|
DoS |
2012-01-05 |
2012-07-03 |
5.0 |
None |
Remote |
Low |
Not required |
None |
None |
Partial |
|
The GOST ENGINE in OpenSSL before 1.0.0f does not properly handle invalid parameters for the GOST block cipher, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via crafted data from a TLS client. |
|
9 |
CVE-2011-3210 |
399 |
|
DoS |
2011-09-22 |
2013-06-05 |
5.0 |
None |
Remote |
Low |
Not required |
None |
None |
Partial |
|
The ephemeral ECDH ciphersuite functionality in OpenSSL 0.9.8 through 0.9.8r and 1.0.x before 1.0.0e does not ensure thread safety during processing of handshake messages from clients, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via out-of-order messages that violate the TLS protocol. |
|
10 |
CVE-2011-1473 |
264 |
|
DoS |
2012-06-16 |
2012-06-18 |
5.0 |
None |
Remote |
Low |
Not required |
None |
None |
Partial |
|
** DISPUTED ** OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, and 0.9.8m through 1.x, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5094. NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment. |
|
11 |
CVE-2006-7250 |
|
|
DoS |
2012-02-29 |
2013-01-22 |
5.0 |
None |
Remote |
Low |
Not required |
None |
None |
Partial |
|
The mime_hdr_cmp function in crypto/asn1/asn_mime.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8t and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted S/MIME message. |
Total number of vulnerabilities : 11
Page :
1
(This Page)
|
|
CVE is a registred trademark of the MITRE Corporation and the authoritative source of CVE content is
MITRE's CVE web site.
CWE is a registred trademark of the MITRE Corporation and the authoritative source of CWE content is
MITRE's CWE web site.
OVAL is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation and the authoritative source of OVAL content is
MITRE's OVAL web site.
Use of this information constitutes acceptance for use in an AS IS condition.
There are NO warranties, implied or otherwise, with regard to this information or its use.
Any use of this information is at the user's risk.
It is the responsibility of user to evaluate the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, opinion, advice or other content.
EACH USER WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY consequences of his or her direct or indirect use of this web site.
ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. This site will NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT,
INDIRECT or any other kind of loss.